AURA @ Melbourne Square

First Non-Emaar, Non-Dubai Listing This Batch — New Market (Australia) and New Developer

AURA @ MSQ was sourced from two developer PDFs at "D:\D2C0\Melbourne\Melbourne Square\" (AURA_Mini_Brochure.pdf, 9 pages; Aura Agent Brief 05032026.pdf, 33 pages) — an entirely new source folder, market and developer for this site, not part of the Emaar batch. Added a new 'australia' Market type value (src/lib/types.ts) and wired it into every market-enumeration surface found via search: Header.tsx's markets dropdown, list-with-us/page.tsx's region groups, DeveloperSignupForm.tsx's options, MarketMap.tsx's per-market map center (Southbank coordinates), and the DLD-adjacent country-code lookup in properties/[slug]/page.tsx (AU). No dedicated /australia market page was built, consistent with how prior new markets (Thailand, Maldives) were added without one. Real per-unit-type starting prices ARE disclosed (unlike most of the Emaar batch) — read directly off the Agent Brief's per-floor-plate pricing pages (Luma L17-28, Nova L30-48) and its building-wide cluster-pricing summary page; priceByType reflects the cheapest disclosed "from" price per bedroom count, always in the lowest-tier cluster (Luma). Higher clusters (Nova, then Alta/Cira, then the Halo penthouse tier) carry meaningfully higher $/m² for the same bedroom count — e.g. a 2 Bed 2 Bath is $990K in Luma but $1.05M+ in Alta/Cira at a larger 101m² — reproduced as a real tiered-pricing structure, not simplified away. One minor internal pack inconsistency reproduced rather than silently resolved: the building-wide summary page lists Luma's cheapest Studio "from $560,000" while the detailed Luma floor-plate page prices that same Studio type's specific unit stack at "from $609K" — plausibly a lower-floor vs. higher-floor difference within the same unit type (unit stacks rise through L8-29), not necessarily an error. No payment plan/deposit structure or firm settlement date is disclosed in either document; Stage 2 (BLVD, which includes AURA) is explicitly labelled "under construction" on the masterplan page, and Melbourne Square's own Stage 1 (the base precinct, a separate already-open development) is labelled "completed" — reproduced as two distinct stages of the one masterplan, not conflated. Developer's established year and completedProjects count are NOT in either source PDF (both are silent on OSK's founding date) — verified instead via web search (OSK Group / Wikipedia / The Edge Malaysia corporate coverage), sourced separately in developer record comments rather than fabricated.